Subject: [IndexedDB] Numeric constants vs enumerated strings I propose that we change the numeric constants to enumerated strings in
the IndexedDB spec. Reasoning is echoing the reasoning that came up for WebRTC: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2012JanMar/0166.html> I'll just shamelessy quote Tobie Langel <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2012JanMar/0168.html>: Anne van Kesteren saying: Unless there are strong ties to certain legacy APIs I would suggest using strings. They are easier for developers to author, easier for developers to maintain, easier in the future to extend, and have practically no drawbacks. I second that. Authors barely ever used the defined constants (for good reason, some implementations were missing them) preferring to use integers directly. Instead of seeing the verbose but descriptive: if (node.nodeType == Node.ELEMENT_NODE) { ... } one came across the following more often than not: if (node.nodeType == 1) { ... } to which: if (node.nodeType == "element") { ... } should be preferred. Constants would only have practical benefits over strings if they were defined in the global scope, as in: if (node.nodeType == NODE_ELEMENT_NODE) { ... } as typos would be caught early on (undeclared variables throw ReferenceErrors). So. What do you think? :-) -- Odin HÃrthe Omdal  Core QA, Opera Software  http://opera.com / |