Please see:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel/5581

of thread at:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gis.proj-4.devel/5569

which suggests that Frank will revert the innovation until it has been
discussed thoroughly.

Roger


Markus Neteler wrote
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Helmut Kudrnovsky <hellik@> wrote:
>> FYI from proj-ML:
>>
>> see
>> http://lists.maptools.org/pipermail/proj/2012-February/006123.html
>>
>> FrankW:
>>>1) Resolve whether it is appropriate for us to have switched from using
>>>+datum= to a detailed definition in the EPSG init file.
>
> To me that's not entirely clear: does Frank plan to solve the problem?
>
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> grass-dev mailing list
> grass-dev@.osgeo
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
>


--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Proj-Proj-Release-switched-from-using-datum-to-a-detailed-definition-in-the-EPSG-init-file-tp4492577p4495707.html
Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev